A staggering amount of income is lost due to inefficiencies in music publishing, with many songwriters unaware of the millions they forfeit annually. This gap, the difference between what songwriters are owed and what they actually receive, stands as a pressing issue in the industry. ## The Scale of the Problem Industry estimates suggest that between 10 and 25 percent of all publishing royalties worldwide go uncollected or misallocated each year. With the global publishing market around $10 billion, this translates to an alarming $1 billion to $2.5 billion lost in songwriter income annually. The problem isn’t fraud; it’s rooted in a fragmented and outdated system that has failed to adapt. ## Why Royalties Go Missing The complexity of royalty collection forms a maze of entities across multiple countries, each with distinct rules, timelines, and data standards. For example, a song streamed on Spotify in Germany sees its mechanical royalties flow from Spotify to Germany's mechanical rights organization (GEMA), then to the publisher, and finally to the songwriter. A hiccup at any stage—incorrect data, unregistered works, or missing publisher affiliations—can result in royalties ending up in suspense accounts or misallocated. This challenge amplifies across various platforms, territories, and rights types. A single song might generate mechanical royalties, performance royalties, sync licensing fees, print royalties, and neighboring rights—all collected by different organizations in their respective countries. If a song features multiple writers linked to different performing rights organizations (PROs), their splits must be accurately registered in every territory generating revenue. ## The Metadata Problem At the heart of the administration gap lies the issue of metadata. Music metadata, which identifies songwriters, ownership, and payment recipients, is often scattered and inconsistent. Organizations employ diverse identifiers like ISRC, ISWC, and IPI numbers, alongside varying data formats and matching algorithms. For example, a song registered with ASCAP as 'Don't Stop Believing' may not align with BMI’s entry for 'Dont Stop Believin', leading to collected royalties being deposited into suspense accounts. The International Standard Musical Work Code (ISWC) was designed to mitigate this issue by providing a universal identifier for musical compositions. However, registration remains optional and inconsistently applied by collection societies, resulting in a reliance on accurate data without a strong mechanism to ensure its integrity. ## What Songwriters Should Do To avoid these pitfalls, songwriters need to register every work with all relevant collection organizations. This includes their PRO (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, or an international equivalent), the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) for digital mechanical royalties in the U.S., and their publisher's administration platform. Complete metadata is crucial, encompassing all contributing writers, their IPI numbers, PRO affiliations, and agreed-upon splits. Songwriters may also benefit from collaborating with a publishing administrator, whether a traditional publisher or modern services like Songtrust, Sentric Music, or CD Baby Pro. These services streamline global registration, royalty collection, and accounting, typically charging a commission ranging from 10 to 15 percent of collected royalties. For those without ties to major publishers, such administrative services can help recover international royalties that would otherwise remain unclaimed. ## The Technology Response As the industry seeks to address the administration gap, technological solutions are slowly emerging. Initiatives include blockchain-based rights registries, automated metadata matching systems, and standardized data exchange protocols. Progress, however, is often hampered by the need for coordination among various independent organizations, each operating with legacy systems and differing priorities. This challenge isn’t about discovering a singular technological solution or policy reform; it’s about implementing incremental advancements. As data standards evolve and registration processes become more automated, the administration gap may begin to close. Until then, songwriters must treat royalty administration with the same focus and diligence they apply to their creative pursuits.
About the Author
Music Rights Attorney & Writer
Entertainment lawyer and writer covering music supervision, copyright ownership, and master rights strategy.
8+ years experience · Practicing Entertainment Attorney (8 years) · 7 articles on Like Hot Cakes
This article was peer-reviewed by Mia Washington, A&R and Talent Reporter, for accuracy and editorial quality before publication. Learn about our review process →
Editorial Disclosure: Like Hot Cakes is an independent publication. This article contains no paid placements, affiliate links, or advertiser-influenced content. Our reporting is funded independently. Read our full ethics policy →