Rethinking Virtual Concerts: A Permanent Shift in Artist Revenue?

Virtual concerts have transformed into a sustainable revenue source, complementing in-person shows rather than replacing them.

Fact-checked by editorial team
Reviewed by Mia Washington
Last reviewed:
Our editorial standards →

Rachel Kim covers this topic as a specialist in Touring Economics with 9+ years of direct music industry experience. Former Tour Marketing Manager, Major Concert Promoter. View full credentials →

Key Takeaways

  • Virtual concerts emerged as a significant revenue stream but did not replace in-person events.
  • Live streaming works well for geographic expansion, exclusive content, and hybrid events.
  • Successful revenue models combine multiple income sources and capitalize on audience engagement.
  • Maintaining high audio quality is essential for a satisfying music streaming experience.
  • Artists should integrate live streaming into a broader engagement strategy to maximize its potential.

The pandemic surged virtual concerts into the spotlight, raising the question: can they become a lasting revenue stream for artists? Three years after in-person events resumed, the answer is complex. While live streaming hasn’t eclipsed physical concerts, it has carved out a viable niche as a complementary revenue stream and audience development tool for artists who adopt a strategic approach. ## The Post-Pandemic Context Virtual concerts experienced a typical boom-and-bust cycle. Initially, lockdowns left platforms like Stageit, Moment House, and Twitch thriving as artists, previously hesitant to stream, embraced the format. They offered virtual tickets ranging from $10 to $50, with some major acts generating substantial income from singular events. As live events returned, virtual concert viewership plummeted. Many casual viewers who attended online primarily during the pandemic shifted back to live shows. The audience that remained consisted of geographically distant fans, those needing accessibility accommodations, and superfans craving more intimate connections. ## Areas Where Live Streaming Excels Live streaming has found solid ground in a few specific scenarios. First, for geographic extension, it enables artists to reach fans in areas not covered by their touring schedules. An artist performing primarily in the U.S. and Europe can engage audiences in Asia, Latin America, and Africa without the costs of international touring. Second, exclusive content, such as behind-the-scenes experiences and intimate Q&A sessions, can be offered online, providing value that goes beyond standard concert experiences. These sessions thrive with smaller audiences, ideally hundreds rather than thousands, and at exclusive price points between $15 and $50. Lastly, hybrid events—live-streaming to a virtual audience during an in-person show—extend the concert experience. This model captures the energy of physical performances while reaching those unable to attend in person, best suited for larger productions like festivals or anniversary shows, where visual appeal is high. ## Revenue Streams in Live Streaming Live streaming revenue sources include virtual ticket sales, audience tips, merchandise deals, and sponsorships. Successful artists view every live streaming event as a multi-revenue opportunity, melding ticket sales with exclusive merchandise and sponsorship integrations. For artists with steady viewership, the numbers are favorable. A consistent monthly stream pulling in 500 viewers at $15 each results in $7,500 per event, leading to potential annual revenues exceeding $150,000 when factoring in additional income streams—no travel, no venue costs, and reduced production expenses. ## Advancements in Technology The tools for professional live streaming have evolved significantly. Platforms like Moment House, Veeps, and Sessions Live provide integrated solutions tailored for musicians, encompassing ticketing, tipping, merchandise sales, and interactive features. Production tools like OBS and Streamlabs, alongside professional hardware, have made it easier to achieve broadcast-quality streams. Prioritizing audio quality is crucial; music live streams require higher fidelity than other streaming types. Platforms that compress audio for gaming quality often fail to meet audience expectations. Artists need to choose platforms that maintain audio integrity, even if it compromises visual quality. ## Strategic Integration of Live Streaming Rather than viewing live streaming as a separate revenue stream, artists should weave it into a broader engagement and monetization strategy. The most successful approach positions live streaming as the middle tier of a three-tier model: free social content at the top for awareness, paid live streams for engaged fans, and physical concerts for the ultimate experience. Artists applying this strategic framework—consistent scheduling, high production value, audience interaction, and holistic business integration—develop sustainable revenue channels that enhance, rather than compete with, their physical touring activities.

About the Author

This article was peer-reviewed by Mia Washington, A&R and Talent Reporter, for accuracy and editorial quality before publication. Learn about our review process →

Editorial Disclosure: Like Hot Cakes is an independent publication. This article contains no paid placements, affiliate links, or advertiser-influenced content. Our reporting is funded independently. Read our full ethics policy →